Benin Dakar Chronicle--Blog by Benin "Beni" Dakar

This blog chronicles the opinions of its creator, Benin "Beni" Dakar.

Name: Benin "Beni" Dakar
Location: Duluth, Georgia, United States

I believe in the power of ONE voice!

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Was Martin Luther King, Jr. a Republican?

By

Beni Dakar

A radio ad played primarily in Maryland and Ohio, sponsored under the auspices of the Black Republican Association is hoping to inspire otherwise reluctant black voters (who traditionally support the Democrats) in those states to support the GOP and their star black Republican candidates – Maryland Lt. Governor Michael S. Steele who is running for the U.S. Senate from that state and Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell who is running for Governor of Ohio – by suggesting that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican too.

The creators of those ads that put forward that King was a Republican and demonize the Democratic Party for creating a Jim Crow South are relying on most Americans being unaware of how the two modern day parties have changed in vision and membership – beginning with the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt.

Martin Luther King Jr. like most educated African-American southerners of his generation was most likely a registered Republican. The southern branch of the Democratic Party often colloquially called the "Dixiecrats" since the post-Reconstruction period had been steadfast in denying human and civil rights to southern blacks. If a black man or black woman was able to register to vote and participate in elections in the Old South – they would have been voting conspicuously against their own welfare to have voted for most southern Democratic candidates prior to Lyndon Johnson's presidential run in 1964.

After the Civil War with the passage of the 15th amendment to the Constitution giving black men the right to vote most African-Americans chose to be affiliated with the Republican Party – because that was the party of Lincoln "The Great Emancipator" and the predominant party affiliation of Federal troops who were sent to occupy the South during the Reconstruction period from 1865-1877. During Reconstruction there were several black Republicans who were elected to both the United States Senate and the House of Representatives, including Mississippi Senator Blanche K. Bruce, who served from 1874-1880.

"The Compromise of 1877" which gave the disputed 1876 presidential election to Ohio Republican presidential candidate Rutherford B. Hayes – required Republicans to withdraw Federal troops from the South. The departure of Federal troops forced most ‘liberal’ white Republicans to flee to the North or to switch to the Democratic Party – since white carpetbagger Republicans feared the wrath of white southerners without the protection of the Federal Government. Indigenous southern blacks – many who could not leave or choose not to take flight were left at the mercy of angry southern whites – and an era of black political disenfranchisement and a solid Democratic South that lasted almost a century was begun.

An array of so called "Black Codes" that southern white Democrats used in conjunction with terrorist tactics by groups like the Ku Klux Klan were used to socially and economically paralyze blacks too. The few blacks who were able to vote in the South and northern blacks continued to vote mostly Republican until the presidential election of 1936.

New York Democrat, Franklin Roosevelt, first elected in 1932, did little to take segregation head on; but his administration did consciously set-aside 10% of its New Deal programs such as the Works Progress Administration (WPA) to be spent specifically to relieve depression era suffering for African-Americans who were also 10% of the American population at that time. Blacks – mostly from the North who could vote showed their appreciation by voting in increasing numbers for the northern Democrat Roosevelt in subsequent elections.

Blacks further became enamored of Democrats when President Truman issued Executive Order 9981 in July 1948 ending racial segregation of the United States military. Southern Democratic leaders of the time were angry about Roosevelt’s and Truman’s more progressive policies that favored blacks. Eugene Talmadge a leading figure in Georgia politics, including being elected three times as governor was outraged at FDRs New Deal policies and opposed his re-nomination in 1936. In 1948, in response to the desegregation of the military southern Democrats founded the short-lived Dixiecrat Party (autonomous from the Democratic Party) and nominated South Carolina Senator Strom Thurman as its candidate for president.

"We have lost the South for a generation" said President Lyndon Johnson after signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which officially ended the Jim Crow era of racial segregation by law and by custom throughout the South. What Johnson meant was that because of the larger Democratic Party's support of the Civil Rights Act and his signing of it -- that southern white Democrats would abandon the party – and he was right; except the change seems to be permanent instead of generational.

The conservative wing of the Republican Party lead by Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater saw an opportunity to swell its ranks with disenchanted white southern Democrats who were troubled by the national Democratic Party's softening on civil rights issues. During the presidential election of 1964, Goldwater won his home state and five Southern states -- this was the beginning of the ongoing exodus of white southerners (former "Dixiecrats) to the Republican Party. Today, most of the south is solidly Republican – in contrast to the solid Democratic South prior to 1964.

In 1968, when King was assassinated the rabid segregationist Lester Maddox – a Democrat was governor of Georgia -- King's home state. It is unlikely that King would have seen a place for himself in a Georgia Democratic Party headed by the likes of Maddox. However, by 1973, this same Democratic Party would include 35 year old newly elected Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson, the first black Mayor of a large Southern city.

Who knows for certain which, if any, major political party King would support, if he were alive today? Both parties have gone through a metamorphosis in the almost forty years since his death.

However, I do think that King might disapprove of his image and memory being used for political gain by a party that has few visible members who celebrate King’s commitment to social justice and non-violence.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Summer snowballs?

This is the new blog entry at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) for Tuesday, July 18, 2006 by Beni Dakar: Summer snowballs?

Thanks for dropping by and reading the blog.

Also, do not forget to leave a comment.

Thank you,

Benin "Beni" Dakar

Summer has long been my favorite season.

Nearly three decades since my school girl days have faded away, I still remember how slowly those last few weeks of school seemed to drag by while eagerly waiting for summer vacation to begin.

I am fortunate to have many wonderful summer memories. However, one memory reigns supreme: The July 1967 snowball fight. Yes, a children’s snowball fight, right in the middle of July.

Like many Gwinnettians, much of my life’s history is in another place. My beginning is in the Midwest, where we fully experience the gladness of all four seasons.

My mother and Aunt Addie, unbeknownst to anyone else, had made dozens and dozens of snowballs throughout the winter and stored them away in brown paper grocery bags kept in my mother’s big deep freezer.

One hot and lazy mid July summer afternoon, my Mom and Auntie challenged about a half dozen of my playmates and me to a snowball fight.

We all looked perplexed and nervously laughed at the adults who proposed such a preposterous idea.

After all, it was hot - July hot – and there was scarcely a cool breeze to be found, much less any snow.

Suddenly, the unbelievable was made believable. Against the backdrop of 90 degree and rising heat, winter’s chill splattered all over my face. Someone had tossed a snowball at me.

My friends’ eyes widened with wonder. Nervous laughter turned into unrestrained merriment.

Like magic, sacks and sacks of snowballs appeared.

For about 15 minutes we enjoyed a supernatural like bliss of hurling the cold snowballs in the summer’s heat at one another.

To this day, that is the most counterintuitive fun that I have ever had.

The other kids could not wait to tell their parents about the summer snowball fight. Several parents came by our house to verify that such an event had indeed occurred. Perhaps, they thought their offspring had just made up a silly story?

I now think about how much love and intention my mother and aunt put into planning for a few minutes of summer time fun for my buddies and me. I wonder what were their thoughts and their inspiration to make and sack and store dozens of snowballs in the winter – to be used as ammunition for a July snowball fight by their daughter/niece’s playmates.

The memory of those remarkable ladies and the delight of that summer snowball fight continue to bring me pleasure.

What is your best childhood summer memory?

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

King papers important for Gwinnett, too

This is the new blog entry at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) for Tuesday, July 11, 2006 by Beni Dakar: King papers important for Gwinnett, too

Thanks for dropping by and reading the blog.

Also, do not forget to leave a comment.

Thank you,

Benin "Beni" Dakar

King papers important for Gwinnett, too

By BENI DAKAR Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 08:50 AM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Shirley Franklin’s political savvy and leadership ability spill over into the entire Atlanta metro region.

Last February, in a speech to the Gwinnett Chamber of Commerce, the Atlanta mayor addressed a capacity crowd of local business and political leaders about the need for a strong regional focus.

Franklin spoke about how Atlanta and metro counties, like Gwinnett, share natural resources of air and water — and, moreover, how we draw from the same labor pool.

Without being smug, Franklin knows that the prestige and attraction of her city has a lead role to play in forging the identity and the perceptions of the metro area and perhaps even the entire state.

That is why it is important, not just for Atlantans, but for all Georgians to celebrate Franklin’s recent success in putting together a rainbow-colored cadre of local business leaders to purchase the papers of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The King papers were purchased in late June for $32 million. The King children had placed their father’s papers with Sotheby’s in New York for auction.

This treasure trove of King’s papers and mementos includes drafts of his famous 1963 March on Washington speech as well as his 1964 Nobel Prize acceptance speech.

It is misguided to believe that the King collection is only important for Atlantans or black people or scholars.

King’s papers are something to be valued and shared by everyone who is committed to rid the world of the cancer of racism and chauvinism in all of its manifestations, the cancer that maims and murders human beings and dries up human potential.

That is why I am steadfast in my belief that Gwinnettians have ample reason to be joyful and proud in knowing the King papers will be housed in nearby Atlanta.

Gwinnett, like most of America has greatly improved in race relations, but the county still has a long way to go.

The minority population of Gwinnett that includes blacks, Asian-Americans and Latinos has grown exponentially over the last decade. Collectively, non-whites now make up 43 percent of the county’s population. But Gwinnett citizens of color have yet to effectively penetrate the vanguard of the existing political and business infrastructure of the county.

The recent faux pas by the library board regarding its Spanish fiction collection in part can be traced to a lack of racial and cultural sensitivity. Having board members who reflect the changing demographics of the county may have diverted them from making such a publicly embarrassing mistake of having elimated and later (to their credit) restoring the funding for Spanish-language reading materials.

Moreover, both the GOP and the Democrats in Gwinnett have tremendous opportunity for more diversity in recruiting, mentoring, and running candidates who reflect a multicultural county.

Although, Gwinnett is about 15 miles north of Atlanta, we are as distant as the North Pole when it comes to Atlanta’s more progressive and inclusive political climate (albeit often contentious). In Gwinnett we have yet to get the recipe right for the “primordial soup” that would enable our own needed version of Shirley Franklin to evolve.

I hope that Gwinnettians will visit, read and be inspired by the King papers.

Perhaps having the King papers in our midst and the outstanding example of regional leadership of Franklin will provide Gwinnett with the drive to move beyond its superficial racial diversity.

Gwinnett is a good place to live, but it will never truly be great until its growing minority population is sought out and welcomed as co-laborers in leading the county’s business and political communities.

In what ways you think the King papers are important for Gwinnettians?

Monday, July 03, 2006

Button Gwinnett’s spirit lives on

This is the new blog entry at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) for Tuesday, July 4, 2006 by Beni Dakar: Button Gwinnett’s spirit lives on

Thanks for dropping by and reading the blog.

Also, do not forget to leave a comment.

Thank you,

Benin "Beni" Dakar

For me the Fourth of July is the most special day in American history.
It is a day that should mean more than backyard barbecues, fireworks, and an extra day of summer shopping.

Without the boldness and courage displayed by the signers of the Declaration of Independence, America as we experience it and love it, may never have existed.


On the Fourth of July 1776, the men who signed this historic document, committed treason against the British Crown. If caught the penalty was likely to be death by hanging. Among those men willing to sacrifice their lives in exchange for being free of British rule were three Georgians: Lyman Hall, George Walton, and Button Gwinnett.


Many people fail to realize that Georgia is one of the original 13 colonies. The first colony founded by the London Company in 1607 was Virginia.

The last colony founded by James Edward Oglethorpe in 1732 and became a Royal Colony in 1752, is our beloved Georgia.


Today’s Gwinnett reflects the spirit of the man the county was named after. Button Gwinnett, like many Gwinnettians today, was an immigrant who hoped to improve his life by settling in the Americas. Gwinnett was born in 1735, in Gloucestershire, England.


When Gwinnett was about 22 years old, he emigrated from England to Charleston, S.C., but later moved to Savannah, Georgia. Although Gwinnett County is named after him, it’s likely than he never set foot here. The land belonged to the Cherokees in his day.


Gwinnett was an outspoken critic of the Crown and his enthusiasm was recognized. He was chosen to be a representative at the Continental Congress, where he added his name to the Declaration of Independence.


Unfortunately, less than a year after the famous signing, Gwinnett died. Upon returning to Georgia, Gwinnett ran for governor and lost to his opponent and “personal enemy,” Lachland McIntosh. Their bitterness towards each other was so great that Gwinnett challenged McIntosh to a duel on May 15, 1777. Both men were badly wounded and Gwinnett died on May 27, 1777.


Because Gwinnett died so soon after the Declaration of Independence was signed; there are very few other documents that have his signature - this makes Gwinnett’s signature among the rarest of all of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. In 2001 his signature sold for $110,000 at Sotheby’s, more than an album signed by all four Beatles.

Happy Birthday America!


How do you celebrate the Fourth of July?

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

We deserve answers from library board

This is the new blog entry at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) for Tuesday, June 27, 2006 by Beni Dakar: We deserve answers from library board

Thanks for dropping by and reading the blog.

Also, do not forget to leave a comment.

Thank you,



Benin "Beni" Dakar

We deserve answers from library board

By BENI DAKAR Tuesday, June 27, 2006

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution


Beni's Bio What do the dates May 10, 1933 and June 12, 2006 have in common? They are both poignant dates for those who love books and democracy.

On May 10, 1933, the Nazis began their infamous ‘book burnings’ and set ablaze over 25,000 library books by Jewish intellectuals and other authors who threatened their misguided Aryan beliefs.

On June 12, 2006, the Gwinnett County library board decided to reduce to ashes the career of Jo Ann Pinder, Gwinnett County public library executive director, because her confidence and vision threatened the close-minded, meddling and misguided Gwinnett County library board.

Pinder had the leadership ability and management acumen to successfully lead the public library for 15 years that enabled it to achieve national honor and recognition as Library of the Year in 2000.

She and the public deserve to know why she was fired earlier this month “without cause.”

If there are documented reasons for Pinder’s dismissal based on her job performance, then the library board should share that with her and the public.

Otherwise, it simply looks like petty politics and personal vendettas being played out at taxpayers’ expense, since the library board is obligated pay Pinder a year’s salary - $127,000 – in severance pay.

Brett Taylor, who was appointed in January 2006 to the library board by District 1 Commissioner Lorraine Green, was the only library board member who voted to retain Pinder.

In a letter addressed to Gwinnett County citizens that the AJC Gwinnett News ran online on June 5, Taylor said the effort to fire Pinder was ignited by personal issues that Phyllis Oxendine had with Pinder.

Oxendine was appointed to the library board by county commission chair Charles Bannister in January 2005 and at one time also worked for the library system.

Taylor also stated in his letter that he believes Oxendine plans to fire several people and eliminate positions from the library executive staff. If this is so, then Pinder’s firing may be just the tip of the iceberg.

If library executive staff is dismantled, it’s possible that Pinder’s work to build an award-winning library will be undone. And if those staffers have employment contracts similar to Pinder’s, the county may also have to give several other library staff fired ‘without cause’ their severance pay.

Following Pinder’s dismissal the library board cut $3000 from its $22 million 2007 budget that was intended to purchase books for its popular Spanish-language fiction collection.

The board’s decision hinted of racism towards the library’s fast-growing Latino community and also appeared to be an assault on Pinder’s efforts to increase Spanish-language offerings.

After an outcry from the public, library board Chairman Lloyd Breck told the AJC Gwinnett News that the board will vote unanimously in a special session on Wednesday to restore funding for Spanish-language books.

The move may be a sign that the library board has moved away from its bullying and tyrannical maneuvers. Let’s hope so.

I encourage the public to continue to pressure the library board until it explains why Pinder was dismissed. They should also demand that those who appointed the board - the county commissioners - break their long silence about her dismissal.

We must remember that the library board serves at the pleasure of the commissioners and that the commissioners serve at the pleasure of the Gwinnett county electorate - which is us!

Have you contacted your commissioner about the library board’s shenanigans?